Author: Truth & Hammer

  • White House Revokes Passes for Almost Entire Press Corps

    White House Revokes Passes for Almost Entire Press Corps

    After almost eliminating press conferences, the Trump administration’s campaign against journalists covering the White House has reached a new peak. On Wednesday, the administration today revoked the hard passes of almost the entire White House press corps, the Washington Post reports.

    After telling all six Post reporters that their hard passes were revoked, the administration then said they’d take requests for “exceptions,” veteran White House journalist Dana Milbank writes. The exceptions were granted for all of the other Post journalists besides Milbank.

    From the Post:

    The White House press office granted exceptions to the other six, but not to me. I strongly suspect it’s because I’m a Trump critic. The move is perfectly in line with Trump’s banning of certain news organizations, including The Post, from his campaign events and his threats to revoke White House credentials of journalists he doesn’t like.

    White House officials provided me no comment for the record.

    Milbank points out that due to this change, nearly the entire press corps will be allowed to cover the White House only under these “exceptions,” which could be revoked at any time.

    After the White House revoked journalist Jim Acosta’s press pass last year, a Trump-appointed judge ordered that it be restored. The judge described the decision to revoke Acosta’s pass as “shrouded in mystery.”

    Now, the White House seems to have created a new standard that supposedly clears things up.

    In response, it seems, the White House established a clear — if nearly impossible — standard: no credentials to any journalist who is not in the building on at least 90 out of the previous 180 days — in other words, seven of every 10 workdays. The White House wouldn’t provide numbers, but it appears most of the White House press corps didn’t qualify for credentials under the new standard, including regulars for The Post and the Associated Press.

    As Milbank points out, the president is barely in the White House himself, and new White House policies around journalists have prevented many from attending events in recent months. That’s one reason many do not meet the high quota of days.

    Milbank also points out that this policy change could mean that some of these journalists will lose their income source.

    Though the culling properly eliminated some (including at The Post) who no longer needed credentials, the victims hurt most were freelance camera operators and technicians who now could lose their livelihood.

    Milbank and others who were not granted exceptions will now be given something called a six-month pass, which he says doesn’t offer the same access as a hard pass.

    Just another day in our increasingly authoritarian America!

    This content was originally published here.

  • Denver first in U.S. to decriminalize psychedelic mushrooms

    Denver first in U.S. to decriminalize psychedelic mushrooms

    Magic mushrooms are seen at the ...
    Peter Dejong, The Associated Press

    Psychedelic mushrooms are seen at the Procare farm in Hazerswoude, central Netherlands, in this 2007 file photo.

    Denver is poised to become the first city in the nation to effectively decriminalize psychedelic mushrooms.

    After trailing in results postings Tuesday night and early Wednesday, final unofficial results just posted showed a reversal of fortune — with Initiative 301 set to pass with nearly 50.6 percent of the vote. The total stands at 89,320 votes in favor and 87,341 against — a margin of 1,979 votes.

    The Denver Elections Division expects to continue accepting military and overseas ballots, but typically those numbers are small. Results will be certified May 16.

    “It’s been one hell of a 21-and-a-half hours,” Initiative 301 campaign manager Kevin Matthews said. “If these results hold, this is an example of the absurd comedy of the great metaphor. Against all odds, we prevailed. This is what happens when a small team of dedicated and passionate people unite under a single idea to create change.”

    As written, I-301 directs police via ordinance to treat enforcement of laws against possession of psilocybin mushrooms as their lowest priority.

    It’s similar to decriminalization measures approved by Denver voters for marijuana years before Colorado’s Amendment 64 legalized the possession and sale of that drug.

    While efforts are afoot to get psilocybin-related measures on the ballot in Oregon and California in 2020, Denver hosted the first-ever U.S. popular vote on the matter, according to organizers. An earlier effort in California last year failed to qualify for the ballot.

    No organized opposition had formed to I-301. But Tuesday night, based on a losing margin of several percentage points at the time, the Centennial Institute at Colorado Christian University applauded Denver voters “for opposing the decriminalization of psychedelic mushrooms.” Director Jeff Hunt added: “Voters took an important step back from embracing yet another illicit drug.”

    Turns out, he jumped the gun.

    The gap tightened throughout the night, and by 1 a.m. Wednesday, when Denver Elections put out its last release before pausing counting for the night, the measure still was losing by a 3.4-percentage-point margin. It overcame that margin by the end of the main count, just after 4 p.m.

    Matthews was “on pins and needles” waiting for the final results, he said earlier Wednesday, but noted: “We’re thrilled that we made it even this far.”

    Psychedelic mushrooms still would remain illegal to buy, sell or possess, with the latter crime a felony that carries a potential punishment of up to a year in prison and a fine. Initiative 301 backers hope to lower the risk users face of getting caught with mushrooms.

    The past marijuana efforts are instructive, though. Denver voters signed off on decriminalization measures in 2005 and 2007, but that didn’t stop police from enforcing the law — though drug law-liberalization advocates say the public discussion prompted by the ballot initiatives helped pave the way for statewide legalization in 2012.

    Initiative 301 calls for Denver to create a panel to monitor the effects of the ordinance.

    This story will be updated.

    This content was originally published here.

  • Nearly a third of nurses are quitting due to stress or declining mental health

    Nearly a third of nurses are quitting due to stress or declining mental health

    Nursing and midwifery numbers are at an all-time high.

    A report, published today by the Nursing and Midwifery Council, reveals that nearly a third of nurses are leaving the profession due to stress or declining mental health.

    ‘The NMC Register’ data report explores the numbers total number of nurses, midwives and nursing associates joining and leaving the register between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2019.

    While the report reveals an overall increase in the total number of registered nurses, midwives and nursing associates, healthcare leaders warn it also highlights a number of major concerns.

    Stress, declining mental health and poor staffing levels were cited amongst the top reasons for quitting the profession. News that comes only a week after official figures revealed hundreds of nurses have taken their own lives in just seven years.

    The report also shows a continued decline in the total number of EU nurses, with over half saying Brexit is a contributing factor for leaving.

    ‘The dam is starting to burst’.

    Dame Donna Kinnair, Chief Executive and General Secretary of the RCN, said: “Any boost to the register is good news but looking behind the headlines raises further concerns.

    “Politicians should be alarmed by the finding that almost one in three quit nursing because of intolerable pressure. They have abused the goodwill of nurses for too long and that dam is starting to burst.

    “The modest increases are not of the scale or kind needed to meet demand and the workforce crisis isn’t abating. It is inappropriate to rely on a steady stream of nurses from beyond the EU, which seems to be the plan in England in particular.

    “The official figures reveal a big net loss in European nurses, with fears over Brexit cited as the main reason for leaving and partly driving efforts to recruit from even further afield.

    “Every country of the UK needs a serious strategy for the domestic workforce to recruit, train and retain a new generation of nurses and have accountability set in law.”

    ‘EU nurses feel they’ll be better off elsewhere’.

    Sara Gorton, UNISON’s Head of Health, said:  “The referendum result has made many EU nationals feel unwelcome. It’s no surprise nurses and midwives think they’ll be better off elsewhere. Not enough has been done to reassure European workers that they’ll have rights, jobs and a future after Brexit.

    “The small rise in the number of home-grown nurses is heading in the right direction, but it’s a drop in the ocean compared to what’s needed.

    “Without proper funding and bold new ideas, experienced professionals from within the UK and across Europe will continue to leave, putting further pressure on the struggling health service.

    “The government should be investing in large-scale apprenticeship programmes to train up existing NHS staff who can’t afford hefty study fees. People who know the NHS already would make great nurses and are more likely to stick around.”

    ‘Another warning shot’.

    Commenting on the report, Andrea Sutcliffe, Chief Executive and Registrar at the NMC, said: “Nurses, midwives and nursing associates make an enormous contribution to the health and wellbeing of millions of people each year so I’m delighted to see such an increase in those joining our register.

    “It’s encouraging to know this is being driven by both UK trained and overseas professionals. It’s clear the changes we’ve introduced – to make it more straightforward for those people with the right skills and knowledge to come and work here from abroad – are making a real difference.

    “However, we only have to look at the well documented concerns around high vacancy and turnover rates that exist right across health and social care to know there’s a long way to go before we have all the people we need to ensure the best and safest care for everyone.

    “And while there has been a drop in the number of people leaving the register, our survey fires yet another warning shot – that the pressures nurses and midwives face are real and must be taken seriously if we are to properly attract, support and retain the workforce that we need now, and for the future.”

    This content was originally published here.

  • Meghan Markle’s name Archie is ‘nod to dad’ and could be her reaching out, claims pal – Mirror Online

    Meghan Markle’s name Archie is ‘nod to dad’ and could be her reaching out, claims pal – Mirror Online

    Thank you for subscribingWe have more newslettersShow meSee our privacy notice

    Meghan Markle’s name choice for her first son with Prince Harry could be a subtle nod to her dad Thomas Markle.

    Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor was born on Monday to the delight of royal fans around the world, and mum and dad seem to be loving every second of their new lives as parents.

    Even though Meghan reportedly hasn’t spoken to her dad in months after a huge fallout around the Royal Wedding, a close friend claims he may have inspired the baby boy’s name.

    The former US actress used to collect the comic Archie with her dad, and was apparently “obsessed with it”.

    The friend told the Sun : “She would spend her weekends going to vintage stores to buy the comics.

    “This could be a little nod to her dad. It was him who instilled that hobby into her, that was their activity together. He would drive her around and also surprise her with vintage volumes.

    “She had at least 100. This may be a way to reach out to her dad, even after all that’s happened.”

    Archie Andrews, who had red hair much like our little Archie’s dad Prince Harry, has been given a new lease of life in the last few years after being picked up as TV series Riverdale.

    We don’t yet know if Meghan has contacted her dad since the birth, but he has released an official statement.

    He said: “I’m delighted to hear that mother and child are doing well.

    “I am proud that my new grandson is born into the British royal family and I am sure that he will grow up to serve the crown and the people of Britain with grace, dignity, and honour.

    “God bless the child and I wish him health and happiness, and my congratulations to my lovely daughter Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry , and God save the Queen.”

    Others also believe Meghan might have named Archie after a cat she used to have with her mum Doria Ragland.

    A pal said: “Meghan loved playing with him and she was always talking about him to her friends. It’s no surprise she named her new baby Archie. She loved that cat.”

    Video Loading

    The video will start in 8Cancel

    Play now

    The Sussexes officially introduced the world to their little boy on Wednesday, but they bumped into someone very special on their walk to the media call.

    Meghan said: “We just bumped into the duke as we were walking by, which was so nice.

    “So it’ll be a nice moment to introduce the baby to more family, and my mum’s with us as well.”

    Harry added: “Another great-grandchild.”

    The little boy, who is seventh in line to the throne, is the Queen’s eighth great-grandchild.

    Baby Sussex was born at 5.26am on Monday, weighing 7lb 3oz.

    The couple, who are just 11 days away from their first wedding anniversary, were beside themselves with joy, giggling and looking into each other’s eyes during the brief interview.

    Read More

    This content was originally published here.

  • Geordie Shore’s Chloe Ferry confirms she’s SPLIT from Sam Gowland following 17 month romance – Chronicle Live

    Geordie Shore’s Chloe Ferry confirms she’s SPLIT from Sam Gowland following 17 month romance – Chronicle Live

    Thank you for subscribingWe have more newslettersShow meSee our privacy notice

    It’s all over for Geordie Shore’s Chloe Ferry and her boyfriend Sam Gowland after she announced they had split.

    The 23-year-old MTV star took to Instagram on Friday to confirm that they had parted ways following 17 months together and insisted they are ‘still friends’.

    Posting on her Instagram Story, the Backworth lass penned: “It hurts me to say this but me and Sam have gone our separate ways. We are still friends. Things carry on as normal.

    “Bring on Saturday for the shop opening.”

    The reality star, who joined Geordie Shore in 2015, is set to open her new beauty venture, CM House of Aesthetics, in Whitley Bay, North Tyneside , on Saturday and assured fans the launch will go ahead as she added.

    In October, Chloe initially sparked speculation that she and Sam has split after she cryptically wrote about “when someone can leave you” and “new starts if life”.

    Read More

    The couple, who share a dog called Ivy together, had been dating since October 2017 and moved in together at the beginning of last year.

    She shared on Twitter at the time: “Sometimes in life you just need to take a step away and just think about your self. 

    “Crazy how everything can be so perfect and the next it’s all gone so quickly time for new starts in life.

    “Don’t ever be second best be with someone who always puts you first and will do anything for you like you would do for them.”

    Geordie Shore’s Chloe Ferry after announcing her split from boyfriend and co-star Sam Gowland on her Instagram Story

    In November, Chloe claimed she wasn’t sure she could imagine herself marrying Sam because of his unique dance moves.

    She said at the time: “To be honest, I don’t know if I want to marry Sam anymore because after seeing them ballroom dance moves, I’ve never seen anything like it.”

    Read More

    However, Chloe changed her tune in March as she revealed she was expecting an imminent proposal before the end of their idyllic break away in March.

    Despite their split, former Love Island star Sam will be reminded of his ex in the coming months after Chloe had her face tattooed on his left thigh during their appearance on Just Tattoo Of Us.

    The pair were tasked with secretly designing inkings for each other, to then have them etched on their skin by the MTV show’s tattoo artists and Chloe was sure to make it one to remember.

    Read More

    However it wasn’t the first inking either of them got in tribute to one another.

    Last July, Chloe had Sam’s name inked on her wrist, with a sweet heart completing the design, while heavily inked Sam had Chloe’s name tattooed onto his neck. 

    MTV Screengrab: Furious Sam Gowland left horrified as Chloe Ferry gets her own FACE tattooed on his leg on Just Tattoo Of Us

    The pair began dating shortly after Sam joined the cast of Geordie Shore in 2017 and appeared to be one of the strongest couples going on the series.

    Days before their split, Sam went head-to-head with fellow Love Island alum Josh Ritchie in a campaign with Hotels.com and admitted that Chloe accused him of having an affair with co-star Nathan Henry.

    Video Loading

    The video will start in 8Cancel

    Play now
    Play now

    Taking part in the online campaign in association with the UEFA Champions League, Sam was asked who he would date if he wasn’t with Chloe.

    He shared: “I might as well go for it… Nathan (Henry). Chloe accused me of having an affair with Nathan”.

    Read More

    Today’s other news stories

    Sam initially found fame on the third series of Love Island, alongside the likes of Chloe Crowhurst, Montana Brown, Olivia Atwood, Chris Hughes and show winners Kem Cetinay and Amber Davies.

    Chloe and Sam found love after the hunk failed to find long-lasting romance with Georgia Harrison in the Mallorcan villa.

    This content was originally published here.

  • Why Sunflowers Are So Green for the Garden – One Green PlanetOne Green Planet

    Why Sunflowers Are So Green for the Garden – One Green PlanetOne Green Planet

    Sunflowers are not the typical crop that newbie gardeners think of growing, but this might be a mistake. The fact of the matter is that sunflowers are really easy to care for, and they can also lend a notable hand in the garden. Then, of course, there are all those sunflower seeds that make a delicious snack and quickly nullify the need to ever buy sunflower seeds (to sow) again.

    Since long before chemical fertilizers and GMO seeds, sunflowers have been a part of agriculture, dating back to at least 3000 BC, and they have been used for all sorts of handy stuff: seeds, oil, medicine, fiber, as well as beauty. Amazingly, sunflowers can sprout up to six feet high in a matter of three months, and seeds are usually harvestable around the same time, possibly extending on to four months.

    Besides being a valuable crop in and of themselves, the Helianthus — or sunflower — family is also used to help out the garden as a whole.

    Easy-Growing

    Any time a productive plant requires little to no inputs and virtually no care, it’s got to make it into the garden somehow. Sunflowers are prairie plants, which has made them very tough, not greatly affected by pests or by drought. They grow in just about any type of soil, and they can survive in both acidic and mildly alkaline pH levels. Once they get themselves established, they are likely there for the long haul, so gardeners won’t be using resources to get (and keep) those sunflowers up. Now that is green gardening.

    Just remember not to completely block the sun from the other crops. Putting tall sunflowers on the south side of the garden might not be a great idea. Otherwise, planting them about six inches apart will supply a living fence around the garden or even between beds.

    Free Garden Stake

    Another popular sunflower function is acting as a free garden stake for climbing vines, such as cucumbers and tomatoes. Unfortunately, sunflowers and green beans — the original garden stake dweller — are known to not be so great of friends. Regardless, sunflowers, like corn, are tall and spindly, so they make great garden stakes for other plants, and they don’t require any extra material. In fact, they can just be composted after the harvest. On the flip side, lettuce likes to grow in the shade of the towering sunflowers.

    Beloved (and recently departed) permaculturist, Toby Hemenway, authored a great bookm— Gaia’s Garden — in which he recommended using Helianthus maximaliani, or Maximilian sunflower, as a deer repellent. Otherwise, despite being beautiful animals and welcomed by many into their yards, deer will gladly ransack a garden and strip it down to nearly nothing.

    Pest Distraction

    More than a repellent, sunflowers are often grown for the quality of distracting pests, specifically aphids, away from other, more tender crops, like tomatoes. Ants, which feed on the aphid-produced honeydew, will encourage and protect aphid colonies to live on sunflowers. It’s one of nature’s outstanding things. No pesticides required.

    Sunflowers are also a new green option because they are particularly attractive to bees and other beneficial, pollen-collecting insects and hummingbirds. As most of us are aware by now, the bees need all the help they can get, so if planting sunflowers did nothing more than that, it’d be worth it. Of course, we know that they do much, much more.

    Soil Cleansing

    Sunflowers are noted as being allelopathic, which means that they emit a chemical that prevents other plants from propagating nearby. In the garden, potatoes and beans are particularly susceptible, so be aware of that. But, this is what makes them so good for garden borders, as they’ll block weeds from growing in. Sunflowers also aid phytoremediation, which is a process that cleans contaminated soils. It’s even been used as an effective soil cleaner in really damaged sites like Chernobyl and post-Katrina New Orleans.

    Of course, many people grow sunflowers for the simple fact that they are stunning, massive flowers that brighten up the scene. Whatever your reason, get them in the garden after the last spring frost and expect to harvest into the fall. Lots of people, especially in areas with long frost-free seasons, will plant a new crop every two weeks to have continuous blooms in the fall. Ain’t it grand when being green just works out so well.

    For more Life, Animal, Vegan Food, Health, and Recipe content published daily, don’t forget to subscribe to the One Green Planet Newsletter!

    Being publicly-funded gives us a greater chance to continue providing you with high quality content. Please support us!

    This content was originally published here.

  • Why the average American hasn’t made a new friend in 5 years

    Why the average American hasn’t made a new friend in 5 years

    Forty-five percent of adults say they find it difficult to make new friends, according to new research.  A new study into the social dynamics of 2,000 Americans revealed that the average American hasn’t made a new friend in five years.  In fact, it seems for many that popularity hits its peak at age 23, and for 36 percent, it peaks even before age 21.  The study, conducted by OnePoll in conjunction with Evite, uncovered that one of the reasons 42 percent of adults struggle to make friends is due to introversion or shyness.  And the challenge is not just in breaking out of their shell but also breaking into new social situations and circles.  The majority of respondents cite friendship-making barriers that include aversion to the bar scene where most people choose to socialize, or the feeling that everyone’s friendship groups have already formed.  Other notable reasons Americans can’t seem to make new friends as an adult include commitments to family (29 percent), not having any hobbies that allow them to meet new people (28 percent) and moving to a new city (21 percent).

    Though adults find the struggle to be very real when it comes to making new friends, they are open to suggestions for expanding their social circle. In fact, 45 percent of those studied reveal they would go out of their way to make new friends if they knew how or had more opportunities.  For the 45 percent who are looking to make new friends, the best and most underrated way to do that these days is still in-person. You can host a party, or something more low-key like book club or happy hour, and tell each of your guests to bring a friend,” said Piera Pizzo, Evite’s in-house party specialist.  “You’ll be surprised at how naturally social circles can come together, and at the lasting connections you can make when bonding face-to-face.”  And how many friends do adults actually have? Turns out, 16. The average American has three friends for life, five people they really like and would hang out with one-on-one, and eight people they like but don’t spend time with one-on-one or seek out.

    Most people have remained close with friends they met when they were younger. Nearly half of those surveyed have stayed friends with peers from high school, and a further 31 percent with peers from college.  Kicking it even more old-school, three in 10 Americans say they have made lasting connections with people they met in their childhood neighborhood.  However, 82 percent of those studied feel like lasting friendships are hard to find. The number one cause of lost friendships is moving away, with 63 percent revealing this to be a reason they’ve fallen out of touch with a former friend.  With no shortage of challenges to staying in touch with friends, how can Americans ensure that growing up doesn’t mean growing apart?  Pizzo suggests: “We know better than anyone else that nothing happens unless you get it on the calendar. Whether it’s a casual bi-weekly dinner with local friends, or an annual trip for long-distance ones, take the initiative to make and set time for the people you value in your life. That time is even proven to make you happier and healthier, so there’s no reason to wait.”

    source

  • And the least feminist nation in the world is… Denmark?

    And the least feminist nation in the world is… Denmark?

    A poll of more than 25,000 people in 23 major countries found that just one in six Danes consider themselves a feminist . It is one of the best places in the world to be a woman, with a narrow gender pay gap, equal employment rights, universal nursery care, and some of the happiest female retirees on the planet.

    So it comes as a surprise to find, in a global survey of attitudes towards gender, equal rights and the #MeToo movement, that Denmark is one of the least feminist countries in the developed world.

    The poll, conducted by the YouGov-Cambridge Globalism Project of more than 25,000 people in 23 major countries, found that just one in six Danes consider themselves a feminist, a third said that wolf whistling at women in the street was acceptable, and two in five had an unfavourable view of the #MeToo movement.

    “It’s a difficult question. What is a modern feminist?” muses Helene Frost Hansen, a 37-year-old accountant, as she bites into her sandwich outside her office on Copenhagen’s City Hall Square. “I don’t want to be equal in all senses.”

    “It depends what you mean. I’m just ordinary, says Charlotte Venvike, a 55-year-old taking her break from the bank where she works. “I’m not marching in the streets.”

    According to the data, only a quarter of Danish women consider themselves feminists, a stark contrast to neighbouring Sweden, where 46% do, and a smaller share even than in countries like Italy, Spain and the UK, which otherwise lag far behind Denmark on gender equality.

    Even Denmark’s Equality Minister Karen Ellemann declared that she didn’t consider herself one when she took up the post three years ago.

    Of a dozen women approached in the Danish capital, only one had time for the f-word.

    “Yes, and I had three daughters and raised them all as feminists,”
    says Charlotte Mathiesen. “The man has to do exactly the same jobs as the women.”

    source

  • ‘Sanctuary City’ Oakland, Near-Broke, Will Use Gas Tax Money to Keep Lights On

    ‘Sanctuary City’ Oakland, Near-Broke, Will Use Gas Tax Money to Keep Lights On

    The City of Oakland is in such dire financial straits that it is planning to use $2.9 million from state gas tax revenues to keep the city’s lights on, rather than using the money to fix pothole-riddled roads, for which the funding was intended.

    The San Francisco Chronicle reported Wednesday that the city is facing severe financial shortfalls, despite a booming economy that has seen wealthier households relocate from San Francisco across the bay to gentrifying neighborhoods.  The problem is that the city’s costs are rising faster than its growing revenues, thanks partly to pension obligations — an increasingly common challenge for large, Democrat-run cities that made ambitious promises to public sector unions.  As Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf — famous for tipping off illegal aliens to an impending federal law enforcement sweep, in an effort to defend her “sanctuary city” — noted in her recent budget statement to the city council last week:  The deficit for this year will be $25 million. As a result, the Chronicle notes, Oakland — which is generously extending benefits to illegal aliens — can barely keep its street lights on.

    To deal with the crisis, the city is shifting money from pothole repair to street lighting, even though the money raised by the 2017 gas tax must be used for transportation.  The city will still apparently have other funds, both from the gas tax and its own revenues, to use for pothole repair — though less than it would otherwise have had.  Republicans attempted to repeal the gas tax hike in a 2018 ballot initiative, but the state government gave the measure a misleading title. As a result, the measure failed, though polls showed a majority of Californians opposed the hike.  The budget notes that the city will spend $150,000 per year on a legal fund to assist illegal aliens facing deportation.

    source

  • Living amid fear and oppression in Xinjiang

    Living amid fear and oppression in Xinjiang

    The small bedroom is frozen in time. The two little girls who used to sleep here left two years ago with their mother and now can’t come home.  Their backpacks and school notebooks sit waiting for their return. A toy bear lies on the bed. Their clothes hang neatly in the closet.  The girls’ grandmother says she can’t bring herself to change it.  “The clothes still smell like them,” she says, her words barely audible through heavy sobs.  Ansila Esten and Nursila Esten, ages 8 and 7, left their home in Almaty, Kazakhstan, with their mother, Adiba Hayrat, in 2017.  The three traveled to China where Adiba Hayrat planned to take a course in makeup application and visit her parents in the western border region of Xinjiang, leaving her husband, Esten Erbol, and then 9-month-old son Nurmeken behind in Kazakhstan, Esten told CNN.  Not long after she arrived, however, her husband says she was detained. He hasn’t heard from her for more than two years.  “My son wasn’t even 1 when she left,” Esten Erbol said. “When he sees young women in the neighborhood, he calls them mama. He doesn’t know what his own mother looks like.”  Adbia Hayrat’s two daughters, Ansila Esten and Nursila Esten, in a family photo kept by their father.  Adiba Hayrat and her two daughters are Chinese citizens, of Kazakh minority descent. She grew up in China, as did their daughters. Their young son was born in Almaty.

    The family was in the process of becoming citizens of Kazakstan when Esten Erbol says Adiba Hayrat was taken by Chinese authorities.
    Her family in Kazakhstan says she was held in a detention camp in Xinjiang for more than a year, while her children were sent to live with distant relatives.  She has since been released, according to her family. But they say Adiba Hayrat is now living with her parents and working in a forced labor facility, earning pitiful wages, unable to contact her family in Kazakhstan for fear of being sent back into detention.
    According to the US State Department, up to 2 million Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyzs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic minorities have been held against their will in massive camps in Xinjiang.  An unknown number are working in what rights groups have described as forced labor facilities, and like Adiba, they are unable to leave China.  Activists and former detainees allege the Xinjiang internment camps were built rapidly over the last three years, the latest stage in an ongoing and widespread crackdown against ethnic minorities in the region.
    Allegations of torture inside the camps are rampant, including in accounts given to CNN by former detainees. The Chinese government has faced a rising tide of international criticism over its Xinjiang policies, including from the United States.
    Critics claim the camps are Beijing’s attempt to eliminate the region’s Islamic cultural and religious traditions — a process of sinicization, by which ethnic minorities are forcibly assimilated into wider majority Han Chinese culture.
    Beijing denies any allegations of torture or political indoctrination, and says the camps are “vocational training centers” designed to fight terrorism.
    Even if you buy that explanation, Esten Erbol said, it wouldn’t apply to his wife. “My wife is not a terrorist,” he said.