Category: US News

  • Four in 10 Americans Embrace Some Form of Socialism

    Four in 10 Americans Embrace Some Form of Socialism

    Americans today are more closely divided than they were earlier in the last century when asked whether some form of socialism would be a good or bad thing for the country. While 51% of U.S. adults say socialism would be a bad thing for the country, 43% believe it would be a good thing. Those results contrast with a 1942 Roper/Fortune survey that found 40% describing socialism as a bad thing, 25% a good thing and 34% not having an opinion.  The Roper/Fortune survey is one of the oldest trend questions measuring attitudes on socialism in the U.S. Gallup’s update of the question in an April 17-30 survey finds Americans more likely to have an opinion on the matter now, as well as a smaller gap in the percentage calling socialism a bad thing vs. a good thing.  Previous Gallup research shows that Americans’ definition of socialism has changed over the years, with nearly one in four now associating the concept with social equality and 17% associating it with the more classical definition of having some degree of government control over the means of production. A majority of Democrats have said they view socialism positively in Gallup polling since 2010, including 57% in the most recent measure in 2018.

    Outlook on Socialism Around the World

    The April 17-30 survey also updates another historical question on socialism. Gallup first asked Americans in 1949 about their outlook on the spread of democracy over the next 50 years. At that time, seven in 10 Americans (72%) predicted that most countries in the world would have a democratic government. It’s important to note that in much of the political rhetoric of the time, the terms democracy and capitalism were more intimately intertwined than they are today, perhaps synonymous to many.

    source

  • 75 American Colleges Offer Black-Only Graduation Ceremonies

    75 American Colleges Offer Black-Only Graduation Ceremonies

    A study by the National Association of Scholars revealed that at least 75 American colleges have black-only graduation ceremonies and 43 percent of surveyed colleges offer segregated residential halls. The organization refers to this as “neo-segregation.”

    According to a study by the National Association of Scholars, graduation ceremonies at American universities are becoming increasingly segregated.  The study revealed that as many as 75 total colleges segregated graduation ceremonies. And that’s not all. 43 percent of the colleges included in the study offer segregated residential halls.  In 2017, Breitbart News reported that Harvard would host a separate graduation ceremony for its black students for the first time.  “We really wanted an opportunity to give voice to the voiceless at Harvard,” an organizer of that ceremony told the Associated Press. “So many students identify with the African diaspora but don’t necessarily feel welcome as part of the larger community, and they don’t feel like their stories are being shared.”  That same year, the University of Delaware hosted a separate graduation ceremony for LGBTQ students. Proponents of these separate ceremonies argue that they allow guests to learn about the unique experiences of the featured group. Others argue that the ceremonies are segregationist and discriminatory.

    Stay tuned to Breitbart News for more updates on this trend.

    source

  • U.S. school fails student for refusing to recite Islamic prayer

    U.S. school fails student for refusing to recite Islamic prayer

    The declarations could have been made by an imam in a mosque sermon.

    “Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian.”

    “Islam at heart is a peaceful religion.”

    Jihad is a “personal struggle in devotion to Islam, especially involving spiritual discipline.”

    “To Muslims, Allah is the same God that is worshiped in Christianity and Judaism.”

    “Men are the managers of the affairs of women” and “Righteous women are therefore obedient.”

    The problem is that those statements were part of the instruction in a public school in Maryland, and one of the students in the classroom now is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to condemn such religious lessons funded by taxpayers.

    The Thomas More Law Center has submitted a petition asking the high court to take up the case of student Caleigh Wood.

    “As a Christian and 11th-grader at La Plata High School in Maryland, Caleigh Wood was taught that ‘Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian.’ She was also required to profess in writing, the Islamic conversion creed, ‘There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.’ Ms. Wood believed that it is a sin to profess by word or in writing, that there is any other god except the Christian God. She stood firm in her Christian beliefs and was punished for it. The school refused her request to opt-out or give her an alternative assignment. She refused to complete her anti-Christian assignment and consequently received a failing grade,” the legal team explained Wednesday.

    Lower courts have given a free pass to the school district to teach Islam, and so TMLC filed the request with the Supreme Court to decide “whether any legal basis exists to allow public schools to discriminate against Christianity while at the same time promote Islam.”

    “Under the guise of teaching history or social studies, public schools across America are promoting the religion of Islam in ways that would never be tolerated for Christianity or any other religion,” said Richard Thompson, TMLC’s president.

    “I’m not aware of any school which has forced a Muslim student to write the Lord’s Prayer or John 3:16: ‘For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life,’” he said.

    “Many public schools have become a hot bed of Islamic propaganda. Teaching Islam in schools has gone far beyond a basic history lesson. Prompted by zealous Islamic activism and emboldened by confusing court decisions, schools are now bending over backwards to promote Islam while at the same time denigrate Christianity. We are asking the Supreme Court to provide the necessary legal guidance to resolve the insidious discrimination against Christians in our public schools,” he said.

    Unresolved include whether or not schools can make preferential statements about one religion over another, and whether students may be required to assert religious beliefs with which they disagree.

    And how do those concepts align with “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”?

    The Charles County public schools and officials are defendants.

    The filing explains the lower courts, despite the First Amendment’s requirements, “upheld the ability for [the school] to denigrate Petitioner Caleigh Wood’s faith and require her to write out statements and prayers contradictory to her own religious beliefs.”

    The lessons “taught Islamic principles as if they were true facts, while Christian principles were treated as mere beliefs,” the filing states.

    For example, students were told the “Quran is the word of Allah” but Christians believe the Gospels were revealed to the New Testament writers.

    Wood refused to write that the Muslim god is the only god, and was failed for her faith.

    The lower courts discounted Wood’s religious convictions and gave the school the go-ahead.

    But instances of mandatory faith training, such as orders to recount a Muslim prayer in contradiction to the student’s own beliefs, conflicts with Supreme Court precedent, the filing said.

    WND has reported in just the past few weeks on a legal team that dispatched cease-and-desist letters to several Washington state school districts that here promoting Islam through a Ramadan policy of giving Muslim students special privileges.

    One district ordered employees to greet Muslim students in Arabic.

    But in recent months the resistance to Islam indoctrination has been growing.

    One group that has fought it, the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, regularly has opposed Islamic teachings in public schools.

    ‘The true faith, Islam’

    Among the cases that have developed:

    In May 2017, in Groesbeck, Texas, a couple moved their sixth-grade daughter to a new school after they discovered her history homework assignment on Islam.

    In late March 2017, as WND reported, a middle school in Chatham, New Jersey, was using a cartoon video to teach the Five Pillars of Islam to seventh-grade students, prompting two parents to obtain legal services to fight the school district, which has ignored their concerns.

    Teaching the five pillars of Islam also created an uproar in Summerville, South Carolina, and in Loganville, Georgia, last year.

    WND also reported in March 2017 a high school in Frisco, Texas, set up an Islamic prayer room specifically for Muslim students to pray on campus during school hours. The same type of prayer rooms have been set up in high schools in St. Cloud, Minnesota, and other school districts.

    In 2015, parents in Tennessee asked the governor, legislature and state education department to investigate pro-Islam bias in textbooks and other materials.

    WND reported in 2012 ACT for America conducted an analysis of 38 textbooks used in the sixth through 12th grades in public schools and found that since the 1990s, discussions of Islam are taking up more and more pages, while the space devoted to Judaism and Christianity has simultaneously decreased.

    In 2009, Gilbert T. Sewall, director of the American Textbook Council, a group that reviews history books, told Fox News the texts were “whitewashing” Islamic extremism and key subjects such as jihad, Islamic law and the status of women.

    Also in 2009, WND reported the middle school textbook “History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond,” published by Teachers’ Curriculum Institute, said an Islamic “jihad” is an effort by Muslims to convince “others to take up worthy causes, such as funding medical research.”

    In 2006, WND reported a school in Oregon taught Islam by having students study and learn Muslim prayers and dress as Muslims.

    WND reported in 2003 a prominent Muslim leader who eventually was convicted on terror-related charges helped write the “Religious Expression in Public Schools” guidelines issued by President Bill Clinton.

    In 2001, shortly after the 9/11 attacks, seventh graders in Byron, California, were taught a three-week course on Islam that required them to learn 25 Islamic terms, 20 proverbs, Islam’s Five Pillars of Faith, 10 key Islamic prophets and disciples, recite from the Quran, wear a robe during class, adopt a Muslim name and stage their own “holy war” in a dice game.

    Parents went to court to uphold their right to reject the class for their children, but a federal judge ruled against them, and in 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider their appeal.

    The post U.S. school fails student for refusing to recite Islamic prayer appeared first on WND.

    This content was originally published here.

  • Trump vows to ‘end’ Iran if it threatens US again

    Trump vows to ‘end’ Iran if it threatens US again

    President Trump threatened to destroy Iran in a tweet sent in the wake of reports that a rocket was fired into Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone less than a mile from the US Embassy.

    “If Iran wants to fight, that will be the official end of Iran. Never threaten the United States again!,” Trump tweeted Sunday afternoon.

    It’s unclear exactly what prompted Trump’s posting, but news outlets reported explosions in Iraq’s capital and that a rocket launcher was discovered in eastern Baghdad, an area that is home to Iranian-backed Shiite militias.

    Roads leading into the Green Zone were briefly closed and no casualties were reported.

    Amid escalating tensions between the US and Iran, there have been concerns that Iraq, where Iranian forces and about 5,000 American troops are stationed, could become entangled in the standoff.

    A Saudi Arabian diplomat said his country doesn’t want to go to war with Iran but will defend itself after two Saudi oil tankers were targeted by acts of sabotage off the coast of the United Arab Emirates last week.

    No group has claimed responsibility for the sabotage, but US officials signaled in reports that Iran encouraged Iraq-based Iranian militants to carry it out.

    Riyadh also accused Tehran of being behind a drone attack on two oil pumping stations in the kingdom, for which Yemen’s Iranian-aligned Houthi group claimed responsibility.

    “The kingdom of Saudi Arabia does not want war in the region and does not strive for that … but at the same time, if the other side chooses war, the kingdom will fight this with all force and determination and it will defend itself, its citizens and its interests,” Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Abel al-Jubeir told reporters.

    The top commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, the country’s elite fighting force, echoed the same sentiments through state media Sunday.

    “Iran is not looking for any type of war, but it is fully prepared to defend itself,” said Maj. Gen. Hossein Salami.

    Tensions have been heightened between Washington and Tehran after reports said Iran was planning to carry out attacks on American troops and ships in the region.

    Earlier this month, the White House sent warships and bombers into the Persian Gulf to counter any threats from Iran and evacuated non-emergency personnel from Iraq.

    The US Navy said the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group conducted exercises in the Arabian Sea over the weekend in a show of the US military’s “lethality and agility to respond to threat” and to protect US interests.

    Trump has employed such bluster before, including when he was negotiating with North Korea to ditch its nuclear weapons program.

    Responding to reports that North Korea had succeeded in attaching nuclear warheads to ballistic missiles, Trump warned leader Kim Jong Un not to threaten the US.

    “North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States,” Trump told reporters in August 2017. “They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.”

    source

  • San Francisco area homeless count increases by double digits

    San Francisco area homeless count increases by double digits

    A federal count shows the number of homeless people increased by double-digit percentages in three San Francisco Bay Area counties over two years as the region struggled to tackle the growing problem, including 17% in San Francisco and 43% in the county that includes Oakland.

    More than 25,000 people were counted as homeless during an overnight tally conducted in San Francisco, Alameda and Silicon Valley’s Santa Clara counties in January. Detailed reports are expected later this year.

    “The initial results of this count show we have more to do to provide more shelter, more exits from homelessness, and to prevent people from becoming homeless in the first place,” said San Francisco Mayor London Breed.

    The San Francisco Bay Area is grappling with a homelessness crisis driven in part by too little housing stock and a raring tech economy that has widened the inequity gap. In San Francisco, the median price of a two-bedroom home is $1.3 million and a family of four earning $117,400 a year is considered low income.

    “We have an affordable housing crisis throughout California,” said Jen Loving, executive director of the nonprofit Destination: Home in Santa Clara County, where homelessness rose 31%.

    “It’s not a surprise for those of us doing this work,” she said. “We need more extremely affordable housing. It’s not magic.”

    The homelessness point-in-time count is conducted every two years and is required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Los Angeles is expected to release its figures on May 31.

    Homelessness is an issue that has riven the Bay Area for years, with elected leaders pledging to do more to address it. However, controversies continually erupt over where to build homeless shelters. Residents of a wealthy San Francisco neighborhood, for example, are fighting the city’s plans to erect a shelter along the waterfront Embarcadero area that is popular with tourists.

    In San Francisco, the number of people who were not sheltered surged 20% to nearly 5,200, driven largely by people who are living in cars. In Santa Clara County, which includes the city of San Jose, the homeless population increased 31% to about 9,700 this year.

    Alameda and San Francisco counties each counted more than 8,000 homeless.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom has proposed giving cities and counties up to $650 million to build and expand emergency homeless shelters. He’s also proposing $10 million to help public colleges and universities house homeless students and $20 million for legal aid for people facing eviction.

    source

  • New York State Senate introduces bill to make texting while walking illegal

    New York State Senate introduces bill to make texting while walking illegal

    Texting while walking isn’t only dangerous, but it could soon be a crime in New York.
    A new bill introduced by the State Senate would make it illegal for people to cross streets in the state with their eyes glued to their smartphone.  These days it’s very common to see eyes on cell phone screens no matter where you are.  “I could use it all day long,” one pedestrian said.  But what if using your electronic device means you could be fined when crossing the road?  “It makes sense, but I feel it’s too much, they’re kind of being too controlling,” smartphone user Jayla Thomas said  “People should, if they are going to get killed crossing the street not paying attention, that’s their fault, I don’t see why you need to legislate common sense,” Lyles Press said.
    While there’s no clear evidence that personal electronic devices used on the streets cause traffic accidents, state lawmakers are considering the use of messaging or playing games just on the streets, where the fines could range from $50 to $150 depending on the number of offenses.

    “This is a bill that says don’t text while crossing the street, wait the 10 seconds, to get to the other side,” Queens Senator John Liu said.  Similar laws have passed in smaller cities in Hawaii and California, but this is New York, with millions of people. So the question is, if it gets the green light, how will it be enforced?  “It’s a statewide law, depending on the municipality, it could be the police, it could be other law enforcement officers,” Liu said.  Some say it’s not going to work, however drivers want the law passed.  +”I’m driving down the street, and someone is not paying attention and they get hit by a car, who is going to get sued?” driver Wanda Richmond said.

    source

  • Govt Program Leads the Fight Against Fake Videos and Disinformation Online

    Govt Program Leads the Fight Against Fake Videos and Disinformation Online

    Fake videos and disinformation known as deep fakes is a growing threat. Now, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, is spearheading the detection of those deep fakes.

    “When you look at an image or a video online, can you tell if it’s been manipulated or not?”

    That’s the central question posed by Dr. Matt Turek, the program manager for the Media Forensics program at DARPA.

    Faking pictures is not new, a portrait painter in 1865 stuck Abraham Lincoln’s head on a southern Civil War politician’s body. A famous 1902 image of former General of the US Army and later President Ulysses S. Grant is actually a composite of three other photographs. Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin’s army of photo-retouchers removed an official from an image after the official was executed in the 1930s.

    But in the span of just a few years, technology has harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to create and manipulate new worlds and new faces.

    From the cityscape of the first AI made streets, to the creation of photorealistic faces that may or may not even exist, researchers at NVIDIA have used AI to play puppet master. In some instances, using videos of dancers to make other researchers put on the moves.

    The level of deep fakes that can be created by deep learning and artificial intelligence is getting harder and harder to detect.

    The ability to synthesize dance patterns is one thing, but the folks at DARPA are working to detect these sorts of manipulations to prevent much more sinister scenarios. Turek said that “you can construct multiple instances of media that all support an event that never happened.”

    The worry is that state actors could use deep fakes to manufacture completely fictitious events. Artificial intelligence isn’t quite there yet, but “with multiple supporting media…the potential for that is probably a year or a couple of years out,” said Turek.

    The man behind the curtain in a 2018 deep fake featuring President Obama is actor Jordan Peele – but the warning is real. “We need to be more vigilant with what we trust from the Internet,” said Peele, in a BuzzFeed produced message.

    “We have a bit of a cat and mouse game going on here,” said Turek. DARPA’s detection team is racing to keep pace as the technology behind a-i-engineered video manipulation accelerates at break-neck speeds.

    “The ability to detect whether an image or video has been manipulated may provide you some clue that maybe there’s a disinformation campaign that’s going on,” said Turek.

    source

  • Transgender Athletes Crush the Girls

    Transgender Athletes Crush the Girls

    If all women, or even half, got together and battled this mess on the legal level, it would go down in flames. But so many women are weak, silly, and easily intimidated by mere words.

    So what if they call you transphobic? Who cares? As a black woman in America, I’ve been called way worse and none of it bothers me because I am confident in who I am.

    Kelsey Bolar’s report is outstanding–well written and right on target. We know those on the left are insane, but to allow them to get away with what they are doing is also insane.

    Boys shouldn’t be allowed to compete as athletes on the girls team because they are not equal in strength, and common sense should prevail. Transgender athletes should have their own teams; that is the only fair way to do this.

    Parents must speak out and remove their daughters from a team that wants to allow trans athletes to compete. Speak up!

    Putting it plainly, they have no right to compete with natural born females because biology doesn’t lie. Not only is it unfair, it also opens the door to a great deal of corruption.

    Imagine this: A transgender female wins all sorts of awards and sets records for female athletes. A college board is impressed and awards said student a scholarship with all the benefits to go with it.

    That student proceeds to higher education and then suddenly has a change of mind. The athlete decides that, through counseling, feelings, yada yada yada, he is indeed male and won’t proceed to a complete gender change.  What then?

    The only way for normally oriented athletes to combat this issue is to pass legislation that forbids athletic ability to be used as a benefit toward higher education. No longer would sports be a crutch, and only intelligence shall be considered toward higher ed. After all, it is fair.

    No child has the right to upset an entire community’s equilibrium in the school system. The parents of transgender athletes are being extremely selfish to think that their kids are entitled to upset a local, regional, or national competition.

    The parents of these transgender kids are at fault, and so are the officials of those sports. There is one fair solution: Transgender athletes must compete with their equals–other transgender athletes. If too few exist in one school, the schools must bring enough kids together to make a reasonable competition.

    It is time for transgender individuals to take full responsibility for their choices and shoulder the tough realities of those choices. Destroying the status quo of school activities is the last result their choices should entail.

    These people need to help each other in their own organizations, not usurp the places of rightful competitors in the schools, as if they have a right to upset everyone else’s lives just for their sexual conveniences.

    source

  • Alabama governor signs controversial abortion ban bill into law

    Alabama governor signs controversial abortion ban bill into law

    Breaking News Emails

    Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.
     / Updated 
    By Doha Madani

    Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed a near-total abortion ban bill designed to challenge more than 40 years of federal abortion protection under Roe v. Wade into law Wednesday.

    The bill, which makes it a felony for a doctor to perform or attempt an abortion during any stage of pregnancy, was approved by the state’s Senate late Tuesday night after a contentious floor debate.

    Alabama legislators passed the bill 25-6 after denying an amendment that would have made exemptions for cases of rape and incest.

    Alabama House Rep. Terri Collins, who sponsored the bill, told NBC News on Tuesday evening that legislators wanted to keep the bill’s text as clean as possible, specifically to address the language in Roe v. Wade, and revisit the question on whether a baby in the womb is considered a person.

    Today, I signed into law the Alabama Human Life Protection Act. To the bill’s many supporters, this legislation stands as a powerful testament to Alabamians’ deeply held belief that every life is precious & that every life is a sacred gift from God. https://t.co/DwKJyAjSs8 pic.twitter.com/PIUQip6nmw

    — Governor Kay Ivey (@GovernorKayIvey)

    The state’s Republican governor said in a statement Wednesday that she personally disagrees with the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision and that the legislation was a testament to “Alabamians’ deeply held belief that every life is precious and that every life is a sacred gift from God.”

    “No matter one’s personal view on abortion, we can all recognize that, at least for the short term, this bill may similarly be unenforceable,” Ivey said. “As citizens of this great country, we must always respect the authority of the U.S. Supreme Court even when we disagree with their decisions.”

    The American Civil Liberties Union’s Alabama chapter promised in a tweet Tuesday night to file a lawsuit against the state in order to “stop this unconstitutional ban and protect every woman’s right to make her own choice about her health care, her body, and her future.”

    With the new conservative majority on the Supreme Court, lawmakers across the country are pushing for tougher abortion laws to challenge the high court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling.

    “Heartbeat abortion” bans have also been signed into law in Mississippi, Kentucky and Ohio this year. Lawmakers in Tennessee, Missouri, South Carolina, Florida, Texas, Louisiana and West Virginia are considering similar proposals.

    In a statement on the Alabama bill, the White House said that President Donald Trump is “defending the dignity of life.”

    “Unlike radical Democrats who have cheered legislation allowing a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb moments from birth, President Trump is protecting our most innocent and vulnerable, defending the dignity of life, and called on Congress to prohibit late-term abortions,” the statement said.

    Doha Madani

    Doha Madani is a breaking news reporter for NBC News. 

    This content was originally published here.

  • Why would an Atheist want to teach the Bible?  Viewpoint Discrimination, is that not what an education is about.  Learning something new?

    Why would an Atheist want to teach the Bible? Viewpoint Discrimination, is that not what an education is about. Learning something new?

    People have nothing better to do than bother your club and want to bully you into making it theirs.  Strange people!  The University of Colorado-Colorado Springs has decided to make policy changes in order to settle a lawsuit brought by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorneys on behalf of a Christian apologetics club on its campus.  As CBN News reported, the student group called “Ratio Christi” was denied formal registration status by UCCS officials starting in 2016.  The ADF says school officials were essentially trying to force the group to allow non-Christians and those with anti-Christian beliefs to lead the club.  Last November, Ratio Christi sued the school arguing that the university’s denial of recognition was a “viewpoint discrimination” against the group’s religious beliefs.  As part of the settlement, the university agreed to grant Ratio Christi registered status, pay over $20,500 in damages and attorneys’ fees, and update its policies to ensure that a student club may require its leadership to promote the purposes of the club and hold beliefs consistent with the group’s mission.

    As a Christian apologetics organization, Ratio Christi seeks to defend the Christian faith and explain how the Bible applies to various current cultural, ethical, and political issues. Any student can attend the events and join the organization. But Ratio Christi requires that those who lead the Christian organization share its religious beliefs. As a result, the university had denied it registered status, limiting its access to funding, meeting and event space, and administrative support.  “We commend the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs for quickly implementing this common-sense policy reform,” ADF Senior Counsel Travis Barham said in a press release. “It would be absurd for the university to require the vegan student group to appoint a meat-lover as its president. Thankfully, the university quickly fixed its policy by adding provisions that respect students’ rights to free association, no longer forcing Christian students to let atheists or other non-Christians to lead their Bible studies in order to become a registered club.”

    The lawsuit, Ratio Christi at the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs v. Sharkey, challenged the university’s policy which allowed UCCS officials to deny registered status to a group because the organization selects leaders that share and will advocate for the organization’s religious or political philosophy.   Like any other student group at a public university, religious student organizations should be free to choose their leaders without the government meddling,” ADF Senior Counsel Tyson Langhofer said. “Today’s university students will be tomorrow’s legislators, judges, university presidents, and voters, and we’re grateful the University of Colorado, has chosen to correct course, encourage diversity of thought, and protect students’ constitutional freedoms.”